Abortion

ABORTION SHOULD BE ILLEGAL IN CANADA BECAUSE IN THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOM, UNDER LEGAL RIGHTS IT SAYS EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND SECURITY OF THE PERSON AND THE RIGHT NOT TO BE DEPRIVED THEREOF EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE. (1) WE DONT HAVE THE RIGHTS TO TAKE AWAY SOMEONES LIFE. IT ISNT A MATTER OF CHOICE. WHEN TWO PEOPLE AGREE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE, THEY SHOULD THINK ABOUT WHAT THE CANADIAN LAW, CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOM, UNDER LEGAL RIGHTS, IS BEING HYPOCRITICAL. ITS BEING HYPOCRITICAL BECAUSE IT SAYS THAT EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO LIVE. SO IF EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO LIVE, THEN WHY HAVE ABORTION? ABORTION IS LIKE KILLING SOMEONE. DOESNT A CHILD HAVE THE RIGHT TO LIVE ON THIS EARTH? THE CANADIAN LAW SHOWS AS IF THEY CARE SO MUCH ABOUT A PERSONS LIFE, ESPECIALLY A CHILDS LIFE, BUT HAVING CHILD BENEFIT, AND ETC. IF THEY REALLY DO CARE ABOUT A CHILDS LIFE SO MUCH, THEN THEY SHOULD MAKE ABORTION ILLEGAL. IF A BORTION IS LEGAL, THEN MURDER AND, SUECIDE SHOULD BE LEGAL, BECAUSE EITHER WAY SOMEONE WILL BE DIEING. THE FETUS MAY NOT HAVE A MOUTH TO TALK WITH, BUT IT DOES HAVE FEELINGS, AND EMOTIONS LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE, BUT IT JUST CANT EXPRESS THEIR FEELINGS, BECAUSE THEY ARE TRAPPED IN A CAGE (WOMB), WHERE THEY CANT TELL US HOW THEY FEEL ABOUT GETTING ABORTED. ABORTION SHOULD ONLY BE LEGAL WHEN YOU HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH SOMEONE YOU DONT WANT IT WITH (RAPE), OR IF THE MOTHER HAS SOME SORT OF SICKNESS. WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE AWAY SOMEONES LIFE. GOD CREATED HUMANS, SO IT IS GODS JOB TO TAKE THEM AWAY WHENEVER HE WANTS TO. WHAT DID A FETUS EVER DO TO DESERVE THIS KIND OF TREATMENT? I AGREE WITH THE FACT THAT, IF A WOMAN GETS RAPED, AND WAS PREGNANT, THEN IN THAT CASE ABORTION SHOULD BE

Coordination of Conjunctions and Punctuation

Coordination of Conjunctions and Punctuation Coordination of Conjunctions and Punctuation Coordination of Conjunctions and Punctuation By Mark Nichol When a conjunction is inserted into a sentence to separate two cumulative elements of the sentence, where commas, if any, are correctly positioned depends on the syntactical structure of the sentence regardless of whether a parenthetical phrase complicates the sentence. In each sentence with parenthesis below, the punctuation is not appropriate for the syntax. Discussion after each example explains the problem, and a revision provides a solution. 1. That debate could place everything on the table and, for that reason, significant tax reform in 2017 may prove challenging to achieve. This sentence consists of two independent clauses interrupted by the modifying phrase â€Å"for that reason† (which introduces the second clause). Without that phrase, the sentence would read, â€Å"That debate could place everything on the table, and significant tax reform in 2017 may prove challenging to achieve.† In the original sentence, â€Å"for that reason† is treated as a parenthetical phrase and is therefore bracketed by commas, but it is an introductory phrase, and so only the following comma is necessary: â€Å"That debate could place everything on the table, and for that reason, significant tax reform in 2017 may prove challenging to achieve.† 2. The business recently acted on the recommendation, and early on in its transformation process, has already generated valuable time and money-saving efficiencies. Here, the second part of the sentence shares the subject â€Å"the business,† so that section of the sentence is not an independent clause. The root sentence is â€Å"The business recently acted on the recommendation and has already generated valuable time and money-saving efficiencies.† Therefore, the punctuation should frame the parenthesis: â€Å"The business recently acted on the recommendation and, early on in its transformation process, has already generated valuable time and money-saving efficiencies.† 3. We observed several cases in which models were built solely based on a quantitative approach, and, as a result, generated poor model fit and model performance. This example has the same syntactical structure as the previous one but includes both a comma intended to separate independent clauses and a pair of commas to set off the parenthetical. However, the part of the sentence following the parenthetical is not an independent clause, so the first comma is an error: â€Å"We observed several cases in which models were built solely based on a quantitative approach and, as a result, generated poor model fit and model performance.† Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Punctuation category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:7 Examples of Passive Voice (And How To Fix Them)"Gratitude" or "Gratefulness"?Advance vs. Advanced